Thursday, August 04, 2005
Queer for the Court
Well, maybe John Roberts isn't all that bad...
I've still got a mixed view of him, though, leaning slightly towards negative. For now, though, let's savor the noise of the far right having a collective embolism, shall we?
EDIT: Aaaaand he's back in the negative.
"devotes a section to the so-called 'right to privacy,' arguing as we have that such an amorphous right is not to be found in the Constitution. He specifically criticizes Roe v. Wade."
I've made known my views on those who say we have no right to privacy. Someone give this man a cavity search. Just because.
I've still got a mixed view of him, though, leaning slightly towards negative. For now, though, let's savor the noise of the far right having a collective embolism, shall we?
EDIT: Aaaaand he's back in the negative.
"devotes a section to the so-called 'right to privacy,' arguing as we have that such an amorphous right is not to be found in the Constitution. He specifically criticizes Roe v. Wade."
I've made known my views on those who say we have no right to privacy. Someone give this man a cavity search. Just because.
